

Free appointment
Call 24/7
In NSW, it is a crime for you to continue to associate with two or more people that have previously been convicted of an indictable offence if the police have previously given you a warning not to do so. If the person consorts with at least two convicted offenders at least 2 times, then they can be charged with the offence of habitual consorting. Habitual consorting carries a maximum penalty of imprisonment for 3 years, a fine of 150 penalty units, or both.
The offence of habitual consorting is often unfair and can impinge on human rights and freedoms because normal social interactions can be deemed a consorting offence even when there is no criminal activity taking place. The result is that people with no prior criminal record can be arrested and convicted of a crime simply because they know people who are criminals. Consorting laws also marginalise those who have been convicted of a crime because they can (at the discretion of police) prevent them from associating with people who are not criminals, where the best course for rehabilitation is for them to build a social network to assist them to integrate back into society.
Given the broad definitions in the legislation, the police have a lot of discretion in deciding if a meeting between warned individuals is committing the offence. While implemented to target organised crime, the law is being used well beyond this intended purpose.
That’s why we fight hard to defend clients charged with habitual consorting. We beat charges against them and, where clients chose to plead guilty, we get them the best results possible including getting section 10, no convictions.
Australian Criminal Law Group is experienced criminal defence lawyers with a track record of beating charges of habitual consorting. Where clients choose to plead guilty, we consistently get the best results possible including having no conviction recorded.
Australian Criminal Law Group has offices in Sydney, Parramatta, and Blacktown, and offers fixed fees, free first consultation, and a 24/7 hotline for phone advice related to criminal law.
If you have been charged with habitual consorting, get in contact with the Australian Criminal Law Group today. Send us a web email or phone us on 02 8815 8167.
In NSW, it is an offence to continue to associate or communicate with people who have prior criminal convictions for certain indictable offences if the police have issued you with an official warning.
For the offence to happen, an official warning must be made in writing or verbally by the police. The warning must include that the person they are associating or communicating with is a convicted offender and that continuing to further consort with that person may lead to being charged with the offence of Habitual consorting.
The offence takes place when the person who receives the warning continues to associate with the convicted criminals, they have received warnings. It doesn’t matter if the communication happens in person, over the phone or electronically, any association is an offence of consorting.
Consorting was an offence in NSW, dealt with in section 546A of the Crimes Act 1900. However, in 2012, several changes to the consorting law were made. Now, consorting offences are dealt with in the Crimes Act 1900, section 93X.
One of the main changes to the law was that it was updated from a summary offence to an indictable offence that carries harsher penalties. At the same time, the maximum penalty for this offence was changed from six months imprisonment and a small fine to a maximum penalty of three years or $33,000 fine or both.
Guidance regarding what constitutes “habitual consorting” was added where it was previously left to the interpretation of the courts (This is defined below). The definition for consorting was extended to include consorting by electronic means such as via the internet or telephone.
Importantly, six defences available to a person charged with consorting were also added to the legislation.
The Act defines consorting as.
consort means consort in person or by any other means, including by electronic or other form of communication.
Consorting is when;
1) A person (other than a person under the age of 14 years) who—
(a) habitually consorts with convicted offenders, and
(b) consorts with those convicted offenders after having been given an official warning in relation to each of those convicted offenders,
(2) A person does not habitually consort with convicted offenders unless—
(a) the person consorts with at least 2 convicted offenders (whether on the same or separate occasions), and
(b) the person consorts with each convicted offender on at least 2 occasions.
(3) An official warning is a warning given by a police officer (orally or in writing) to the effect that—
(a) a certain person is a convicted offender, and
(b) habitually consorting with convicted offenders is an offence.
(4) An official warning ceases to have effect for the purposes of subsection (1)—
(a) if the warning is given to a person under the age of 18 years—6 months after the warning is given, or
(b) in any other case—2 years after the warning is given.
“consort” is not defined in the Crimes Act other than to mention the inclusion of telephone and email communications to be included as “consorting”.
However, The High Court in Tajjour v New South Wales; Hawthorne v New South Wales; Forster v New South Wales [2014] HCA 35, affirmed that provisions setting out consorting offences be interpreted in line with the leading High Court decision in Johanson v Dixon (1979) 143 CLR 376.81.
In Johanson v Dixon, the court established that consorting “means ‘associates’ or ‘keeps company’”, ‘denotes some seeking or acceptance of the association on the part of the defendant’, and need not occur for any unlawful intention or criminal purpose.
Where consort means a type of companionship or seeking companionship, “Habitual Consorting” involves 2 or more instances of consorting with 2 or more people.
Guidance regarding “habitual consorting” was added to the legislation in the 2012 changes. Previously, a lack of guidance meant “habitually consorting” was open to interpretation by the courts. The courts previously interpreted this to mean seven or more occasions of consorting with one person within a six-month period.
“Habitually consorting” now involves a minimum of consorting with two people on at least two occasions.
Section 93X of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) states that for an offence of habitual consorting to take place, an official warning must first be given by the police. The official warning must inform the person that they are consorting with a convicted offender and that habitually consorting with convicted offenders is an offence.
Requirements for an official warning
Any person over the age 10 years can be issued a warning. However, there are a number of requirements to provide an ‘official warning’. They are as follows;
Normally, an official warning will be in effect for 2 years from the time that the warning was given. However, if the person is under the age of 18 years, the warning will be in effect for 6 months after it is given.
If you choose to plead not guilty to habitual consorting, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that;
Particular acts of consorting must be disregarded if they are reasonable in the circumstance. Reasonable circumstances ton disregard consorting offences include associations with family members, as part of lawful employment, and education. A full list, as per the Crimes Act 1900 is listed following.
Reasonable circumstances are outlined in the Crimes Act as:
Family member includes a new definition for defendants who are an Aboriginal person or Torres Strait Islander. For them, a Family member includes a person who is or has been part of the extended family or kin of the defendant according to the indigenous kinship system of the defendant’s culture.
If you committed the offence and the prosecution can prove so, you should plead guilty to the charges you’re guilty of. Pleading guilty early can result in better results including more favourable sentencing and lenient penalties.
Even if you plead guilty, we will fight to get you the best results possible. We will often negotiate with prosecutors for you to plead guilty to less serious facts, or even a less serious charge so that you get a lighter sentence.
We regularly get clients the best possible outcomes for charges of habitual consorting. This includes no convictions.
We recommend preparing good character references for your court case, should you choose to plead guilty. Having good character references can show the courts that you are a good person, of good character and an important member of society. This helps greatly in obtaining more lenient sentences.
Our criminal lawyers are experts at obtaining the best outcome possible for consorting offences. For these offences, a good lawyer can be the difference between a conviction and no criminal record and freedom or jail.
To discuss your charge, call Australian Criminal Law Group on 02 8815 8167, make a website enquiry or email us at info@aclawgroup.com.au.
Australian Criminal Law Group have offices in Sydney, Parramatta and Blacktown and regularly represents clients from across the broader Sydney area.
Source
Crimes Act 1900 No 40, Part 3A, Division 7, the current version for 1 April 2022 (accessed 14 April 2022)
This information is intended as a general guide to law only. It should not be relied on as legal advice and it is recommended that you speak with a qualified lawyer about your situation.
Australian Criminal Law Group and its suppliers make every reasonable effort to ensure the accuracy and validity of the information provided on its web pages. At the time of updating, this information was correct, however, given the laws in NSW and Australia are continually changing, the Australian Criminal Law Group makes no warranties or representations as to its accuracy.