Mid Range PCA

What is Mid Range PCA?

The offence of Mid-Range PCA is committed by a driver who drives a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration above 0.08 and below 0.149.

Depending on your how high your reading is and the circumstances of your offending, a court may deal with a Mid-Range PCA offence by way of section 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, meaning no conviction will be recorded, you keep your driver’s licence (it isn’t disqualified) and you will have no criminal record. To find out more about a section 10, click here.

Can a Mid Range PCA offence be aggravated?

Yes. The moral culpability of a Mid Range PCA offender will be increased where:

  • The number of prior PCA offences;
  • The degree of intoxication above 0.08;
  • Erratic or aggressive driving;
  • A collision between the vehicle and any other object;
  • Competitive driving or showing off;
  • The length of the journey at which others are exposed to risk;
  • The number of persons actually put at risk by the driving.

Where a Mid Range PCA is aggravated, the Magistrate will regard the charge as more serious and normally impose a harsher penalty.

Penalty for a first offence

The maximum penalty for Mid-Range PCA, if it is your first major traffic offence within 5 years, is a fine of $2,200.00 and/or 9 months imprisonment. There is an automatic disqualification period of 12 months and a minimum disqualification period of 6 months unless the matter is dealt with pursuant to section 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act in which case you will not be disqualified from driving. To find out more about a section 10, click here.

Penalty where the offence is a second or subsequent major offence within 5 years

The maximum penalty for Mid-Range PCA, if it is your second or subsequent major offence within 5 years, is a fine of $3,300.00 and/or 12 months imprisonment. There is an automatic disqualification period of 3 years and a minimum disqualification period of 12 months unless the matter is dealt with pursuant to section 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act in which case you will not be disqualified from driving. To find out more about a section 10, click here.

Do I need references for a drink driving charge?

In deciding whether to deal with your matter by way of section 10, the court will consider, amongst other factors:

  • Your character (employment, family, charity)
  • Your criminal record (if any)
  • Your traffic record
  • The circumstances of you consuming alcohol
  • The circumstances of your driving
  • The deliberateness of your offending
  • Your need for a licence in particular for employment, family or medical reasons, or where you live in a remote area
  • Whether you have completed the Traffic Offenders Program

In order to obtain a section 10, drink driving cases should be tailored to address the above factors and matters unique to your own case. In order to give you the best chance of keeping your licence, it is recommended that you work closely with one of our solicitors to prepare your case. Your criminal lawyer will request you obtain references. If the offence is one that carries a loss of licence, the referees should state your needs for a licence. Below are some reasons a court may invoke for not recording, or reducing, a disqualification period.

Employment

Loss of employment is a classic reason for a court not disqualifying a person. If a person will lose their job if they lose their licence then the referee should put forward that assertion with absolute certainty. The court will see straight through waffle such as “his position may be reviewed”. For example:

A licence disqualification will prevent Joe Blog’s from fulfilling his duties and hence, if this occurs, he will be asked to temporarily leave his post until the disqualification lapses or if the disqualification is for more than 3 months, his employment will be terminated as per clause 8.2 of his contract enclosed herein. There is no discretion in this situation. He is a sales representative and our clients cannot be serviced by public transport.

Lack of public transport

No viable alternative transport is a matter the court may consider when deciding whether to impose a disqualification. This mainly applies to people in the country, but may apply if you are a shift worker, reside or work in an area not serviced by public transport, or to females who work late. For example:

Joe Blog’s works at Marayong Chickens in an industrial area where there is no public transport. He wakes up at 3am, leaves at 4am, and starts his shift at 5am. We have explored all options and, as he is the only licenced driver in our family, he has no way to get to work if he loses his licence. We have a mortgage and two school age children. Without a licence, he cannot get to work. Worse still, we’d have no way to get to the Richmond shops, a 20 minute drive from where we live on acreage.

Family responsibilities

Family reasons such as care for a child or elderly parents, sickness of yourself or another who relies upon your ability to drive, are matters a court may consider. For example:

Joe Blogs resigned from his job to look after our sick son as he is the only licenced driver in our family who could take him to his daily medical appointments. When he stopped working, I started a lower paying job. Even though it meant less money, it was the only way we could ensure our son received the treatment he needed. Joe is with our son 24 hours a day in case his conditions worsens and he needs to be taken to hospital. We simply cannot look after our son without a car.

A detailed guide to reference writing can be viewed here.

Penalties a court in NSW can impose:

The Interlock Program 

In NSW, courts are required to make Mandatory Interlock Orders upon conviction of certain drink drive and traffic offences. If you commit one of the offences and are convicted, you will be disqualified from driving and ordered to install an interlock device in your car, motorbike or truck.

Below is a table with the relevant disqualification and interlock periods for different offences.

Offence Minimum time off the road Maximum time off the road Minimum time in interlock program
Novice Range, Special Range or Low Range (second offence) 1 months 3 months 12 months
Mid Range (second offence) 6 months 9 months 12 months
High Range 6 months 9 months 24 months
High Range (second offence) 9 months 12 months 48 months
DUI (second offence) 6 months 9 months 2 months
Refuse/fail to provide sample 6 months 9 months 24 months
Refuse/fail to provide sample (second offence) 9 months 12 months 48 months

Defences to drink driving charges

The following are defences to drink driving charges.

  • Disputing the Blood Alcohol reading – The offence of drink driving relates to your blood alcohol content when you drive the car, not when you are breath tested. It takes about 30 minutes for the police to arrest you and take you to the police station for a second, more accurate test. In this time it is normal for your blood alcohol level to go up or down. It follows that the reading recorded by police may not be a good representation of your blood alcohol content at the time of driving. By referring your case to a pharmacologist, we may be able to obtain evidence that although you were over the limit at the time of your breath analysis, you were not over the limit at the time you drove or, if you were, you were at a lower range than charged e.g. low range rather than mid-range.
  • Honest and reasonable mistake of fact – This defence is available but Magistrates are extremely hesitant to uphold it for public policy reasons and the reasonableness element of the offence is applied stringently. This defence states that you are not guilty of a drink driving offence if, at the time of driving, you held an honest belief that you were under the limit and it was reasonable for you to hold that belief in all of the circumstances. Examples of where this defence may be run are cases where people drive the ‘morning after’ thinking the alcohol is out of their system or where they have followed the prior RTA directive in relation to alcoholic consumption and driving (two standard drinks in the first hour and one every hour after).
  • Breath analysis not taken within two hours of driving – The police are required to prove that you had the blood alcohol concentration alleged at the time you were driving. The law requires that the breath analysis occurred within 2 hours of driving. Where police attend at the scene of an accident often they will arrive more than 2 hours since the time of the accident.
  • Home safe rule – The law prohibits the police from demanding a breath test of a driver at their home. If police breath test you at home in breach of this rule, the evidence of your reading may be inadmissible.

Why choose AC Law Group?

Our solicitors are experts at obtaining section 10 dismissals for Mid Range PCA. For these offences, we offer fixed fees with no hidden extras. To read more about AC Law Group, click here, and call us at Sydney, Parramatta, Blacktown and Redfern or make a website inquiry today.

Case Study

Mr Correy represented a woman charged with Mid-Range PCA but her reading was almost in the high range. The woman suffered from bi-polar. Mr Correy tendered evidence that the woman had been directed by her surgeon, following surgery, not to take her medication. The consequence was that she had been in a hyper-manic state at the time she consumed the alcohol and drove. The Magistrate agreed she should not be held morally culpable for what occurred and dismissed the case pursuant to section 10, meaning she kept her licence.

Case study

Mr Adut represented a man charged with a fifth drink driving offence at Parramatta Local Court. The offending was aggravated by the fact their had been an accident. The Magistrate had indicated to the client on a prior occasion that he was going to send the man to gaol. Mr Adut attended court with the client, obtained psychological evidence as to his history of depression, and argued that options other than full time imprisonment were appropriate despite the seriousness of the offending and the repeated episodes of similar conduct. In the end, the Magistrate was convinced and the client was ordered to complete community service.

Case Study

AC Law Group represented an Iranian asylum seeker who was charged with Mid-Range PCA that was almost in the high range. He was stopped by police after he drove the wrong way up a street, which is considered to be an aggravating factor. Our solicitor tendered a letter from a immigration agent stating that any offending, including a PCA, could lead to the client’s bridging visa being revoked. Further evidence, being immigration department letters and documents, were tendered. The Magistrate accepted the potential consequences of a conviction were so severe that the matter could be dealt with pursuant to section 10 and dismissed the charge accordingly.

Contact us to book a FREE first consultation

Scroll Up